Operational Automation
An expensive process in back office, ops, or analyst work that people keep saying should be automated. I map it with the people who run it, measure what it costs today, and decide what should be fully automated, what needs a human in the loop, and what shouldn't be built at all. When we do build, it's with guardrails, and with a data path that can run at the edge when records can't leave your environment.
Best when
You have a real production process that might be worth automating, a team you'd rather empower than replace, and you're open to hearing that the right answer is human-in-the-loop, or no software at all.
Want to pressure-test fit quickly?
Schedule a CallIncluded in every engagement
- A measured baseline before any build
- Training and documentation for your team
- A defined handoff scoped to your readiness
What you get
Typical engagements
How I think about it
Consequential automation is an engineering problem before it's an AI problem. The first call is whether it should be built at all. Then whether each step wants full automation, a human in the loop, or nothing. I make those calls alongside the operators doing the work, and the goal is better work for your people, not a black box that replaces them. If the answer is to leave it alone, I'll say so.
Other engagements
AI Workflow Optimization
AI is already in production. Costs are climbing, performance is uneven, or one frontier model is doing every job. I audit the workflow, run evals task by task, and hand back a system that costs less and holds up better. You keep the eval suite.
AI & Automation Readiness
You want to automate, but data is scattered, systems don't talk, or AI shipped with no harness. You need clean accessible data, addressable systems, guardrails around anything stochastic, and a data path security can stand behind.